I ask myself questions and look for appropriate formulations.
I would like to know the opinion of politicians and officials on these formulations.
However, I am more interested in the opinion of ordinary citizens. And I hereby ask for the modification, simplification, generalization and addition of the above formulations.
ANSWER : We each have responsibility for the state of society and the world in proportion to our position, entrusted powers, income, property, education, and intelligence. The fact that someone has position, powers, income, or property and lacks education and intelligence does not absolve them of responsibility.
A THIEF must be considered a THIEF without limitation (even retrospectively), in any period (in prosperity and crisis), who had or has disproportionate profits from activities that are necessary for taxpayers (required by law) or necessary and necessary for their lives. A thief must also be considered a person who consciously or unconsciously supports this or participates in it.
THEFT must be considered, without limitation, conscious or unconscious participation in creating a false picture of facts (even retrospectively), from which someone directly or indirectly benefits, and which has led to economic harm to ordinary citizens.
Anyone who profits from war and armaments or participated in creating a false picture of the facts that led to the war or its support must be considered a THIEF and MURDERER without limitation (even retroactively).
I REJECT totalitarian, criminal practices, lying, manipulation and double standards.
A citizen freely decides what and for whom he will lay down his life . He is not the property of the EU or the Czech Republic, nor is he their slave.
THE USE OF SANCTIONS, SUBSIDIES AND DEBT stems from the inability or unwillingness to seek and find systemic and fair instruments of governance and cooperation between countries, or is aimed at controlling us. All of the above are probably true.
REPRESSION AND CENSORSHIP against "ordinary" people through imperfect laws are used by those who have no arguments.
THE INTERESTS OF THE CZECH REPUBLIC ARE DAMAGED IN THE LONG TERM and we all bear responsibility for the damage, according to the key given in the point " RESPONSIBILITY FOR KNOWLEDGE ".
The HYSTERIA AROUND CO2 of politicians and Greta Thunberg would be solved by knowing "something" about photosynthesis, deforestation, chemicalization and soil drainage. We all bear responsibility for the damage caused by erroneous conclusions and decisions, according to the key given in the point " ANSWER ABOUT KNOWLEDGE ".
IMMIGRATION and its financing by citizens is not a solution to help countries that are worse off than us. It is not about "giving them fish", but "teaching them to fish". Providing knowledge, technology and releasing patents. We all bear responsibility for the damage caused by erroneous conclusions and decisions, according to the key given in the point " ANSWER ON KNOWLEDGE ".
WHAT ARE WHO, PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AND WHAT THE TITLES "MEAN" , helped us understand Covid "pandemics" and "effective" "vaccines". "Ukraine" completed this knowledge. We must take care of our lives ourselves. We each bear responsibility for the damage caused by erroneous conclusions and decisions, according to the key given in the point " ANSWER ON KNOWLEDGE ".
"AGREEMENT" BETWEEN THE CZECH REPUBLIC AND THE USA on cooperation in the field of defense and the purchase of the F-35. We each bear responsibility for damages caused by erroneous conclusions and decisions, according to the key given in the " ANSWER ON KNOWLEDGE " section .
THE WORLD IS EMANCIPATING. The economy of the West and its "elite" has long benefited from speculation, manipulation, theft, fraud, extortion, corruption, "quantitative easing", colonies, etc. in order to maintain its prosperity. This is no longer working. It is trying to maintain its power in the world using the "divide and rule" method, creating hotbeds of conflict. We are all responsible for the damage caused by erroneous conclusions and decisions, according to the key given in the " ANSWER ON KNOWLEDGE " section.
I CONSIDER EVERY KILLING AS A FAILURE of both sides of the conflict. When looking for the culprit and causes, I evaluate who had and has the greatest benefit and income from it. It will not be the dead and their families. It is the politicians on both sides and their inability and unwillingness to find systemic and fair instruments of management and cooperation between countries. We all bear responsibility for the damage caused by erroneous conclusions and decisions, according to the key given in the point " ANSWER ON KNOWLEDGE ".
DIRECT DISCRIMINATION means any action, including omission, in which one person is treated less favourably than another person in a comparable situation is or was treated or would be treated. What law or mechanism ensures that discrimination does not occur when one group of people sends another group of people to their deaths without the latter exposing themselves and their families to the same danger or benefiting in any way from this discrimination, due to their position? Everyone is responsible for the damage caused by discrimination, according to the key given in the " ANSWER ON KNOWLEDGE " section.
LET US BE AN EXAMPLE for other countries by introducing appropriate laws and principles, such as:
- In the event of a military conflict , require the sending of male descendants of members of the government, deputies and senators to the front line and confiscate a legally defined portion of their property so that they are motivated in advance to prevent conflicts.
- If it turns out that they have somehow circumvented this law, another law would address this.
- No one may hold managerial positions in the state :
- who does not have a functional family with children
- whose children (descendants) grow up, study or work abroad for a long time
- the family must share a common household and the children must be older than the legal age to show that the family is functional
-
- owns companies or property abroad whose value is greater than that defined by law
- he or his close relatives may not acquire a company or property abroad before at least twice the number of years of his mandate has elapsed since its termination
- To risk one's life for one's homeland, for one's state, must be only a voluntary choice of citizens, and this can only be demanded by someone who has their respect and trust.
I am going to ask politicians and officials to answer these questions :
- Do you have any reservations about the above formulations?
- If you have reservations, state what they are and suggest a more appropriate formulation.
- List the results of your work that you value most and that will convince us citizens that you are acting in our interest.
- Provide a way to objectively evaluate your work in terms of its contribution.
- What steps have you taken between 2014 and 2021 in an effort to prevent conflict in Ukraine?
- How do you propose to assess responsibility and the method of "reward" (with regard to the principle of " RESPONSIBILITY FOR KNOWLEDGE ", mentioned first) for damages caused by erroneous conclusions and decisions?
- What would happen if you didn't come to work?
- How would your absence from work, for one day, week, month, and year, affect the lives of citizens in the following days, weeks, months, and years?
- Do you think there is no one better suited for the job you do?
- Do you think you have the trust of the citizens?
- How do you evaluate citizens' trust in you?
- What is the structure of citizens' trust in you in terms of age, education, profession, property, income?
In my next document, I will "try" to continue with questions about how to bring principles that "don't work" to "life".
Jiří Bránka
published: 2.4.2025